New Obamao group attacks Glenn Beck

Thinking the outrage by Americans upset with the 90 degree left turn off a socialist cliff our country is taking under the direction of Chairman Obamao and his push for rationalized & socialized hellth care would subside (like it usually has in the past when the outrage WAS manufactured by the GOP), the lefty's just continued praying to their Ninny Pelosi statues and usually drifted off into a peaceful sleep holding their Obama dolls as they counted socialists instead of sheep.

Seeing that this outrage over the U.S. becoming a more socialist style country has not only grown but has exploded, the liberal left is starting to fight back.

I was first alerted to their "Johnny come lately" resistance when I stumbled across this post by a local lefty - Tim "I like Little Boys" Russo - the Progressive Perv. In the post Timmy the Teen Tickler was promoting attacks against the Glenn Beck show by targeting his advertisers. A quick Internet search showed he was only teaming up with other progressive pukes being led by the nose by Color of Change. Color of Change appears to be the new "wanna be" NAACP group formed to protect President Obama and further advance the "victim hood" status so often promoted by these types of groups.

Here is a post made by Color of Change founder James Rucker on the electronic bible for leftys -- the Huffington Post...

Last week, after Glenn Beck called President Obama a "racist" who has a "deep-seated hatred for white people," we asked ColorOfChange members to call on Beck's advertisers to pull their funding from his show. More than 50,000 people have already joined the call, and today we have great news to report -- advertisers are starting to listen:

Three companies who run ads during Glenn Beck -- NexisLexis-owned Lawyers.com, Procter & Gamble and Progressive Insurance -- today distanced themselves from Beck. LexisNexis has pulled its advertising from Beck and says it has no plans to advertise on the program in the future. Both Procter & Gamble and Progressive Insurance called the Beck advertising placements an error that they would correct.

Since we released our statement announcing the news this morning, another company, S.C. Johnson (Pledge, Ziplock, Off!) told us that it was a mistake for their ads to be running on Beck's show, and that they'd make sure it wouldn't happen again in the future. (UPDATE: Our contact at S.C. Johnson wanted us to clarify that they have had no knowledge of their ad running on the Glenn Beck show (they wanted to verify this for themselves), and if it did happen, it was not something they requested.)

This is great progress, and it shows how effective it can be when thousands of people tell advertisers not to support this kind of hateful rhetoric. Now we need to step up the pressure on Beck's other advertisers. More...

The selective anger over these race-baiting type groups like Color of Change is so predictable. They are upset over Beck calling Obamao a racist; though it has yet to be proven he, Obama, is in fact a full-fledged overt racist, his actions and words to date show he does use racial profiling when selecting appointments for offices and when it comes to the application of the law.

Holder? Sotomayer? Stupid Officer Crowley? Gun-toting, Bible-thumping Rednecks? Rev. Wright?

Steaming Load of the Week Award: Professional race mongers dust off the ‘great white bigot’ canard and run it up the Ethnocrat flagpole

From Politically Incorrect Gazette --

Steaming Load of the Week Award: Professional race mongers dust off the ‘great white bigot’ canard and run it up the Ethnocrat flagpole.

The headline itself "Independent Report Claims Militia Groups on the Rise", made my race hustler alarm start blaring. That early warning system got louder, when I read the name of the race pimps perpetrating this stinker: the Southern Poverty Law Center. That’s right, PIGsters, the SPLC is sending another ‘great white bigot’ turd down their poop chutes. This time, it’s not the KKK who has Ethnocrat hairdos ablaze. Nope, this time out, it’s that perennial ‘great white bigot’ favorite, ‘militia groups’.

Suitably alarmed, the SPLC race mongers cite what they seem to view as a perfect storm of militia-nurturing factors: a crappy economy; a ‘liberal’ (Marxist is much more accurate) administration, and a Melanin-Enriched president. Faced with that triple threat, so-called militias are gearing up to promote such ‘great white bigot’ mainstays as lower taxes, reigning in our out of control Nanny State, enforcing our national sovereignty by stemming the border jumping scumbag invasion, and - GASP - sovereign individualism (the SPLC calls it "sovereign citizenship").

The SPLC’s histrionics reached a crescendo when they sounded this great white bigot warning:

"White supremacists and militias are more violent and thus more likely to conduct mass-casualty attacks on the scale of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing."

When pressed for a smoking gun, the best these race mongers could do is dredge up a handful of conspiracy theory spewing nutjobs plus some lone wolf asshats. All of these nutjobs are armed, dangerous, no shit bonkers, and begging for a room with no view in the raving nutjob wing of a graybar hotel.

The down and dirty on this butt bullet is obvious. If you believe in inalienable individual liberty, you’re a charter member of the great white bigot militia. If you think the Nanny State needs to keep its power mad mitts off your life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, you’re a charter member of the great white bigot militia. If you have the insane notion that you are best judge of how, when, and where to spend your own money, you’re a charter member of the great white bigot militia. If you think that immigrants should enter this country through the FRONT DOOR, LEGALLY, you’re a charter member of the great white bigot militia. If you think the last thing America needs in the Oval Office is a malignant narcissist with delusions of messianic grandeur who isn’t the least bit qualified for the office he holds, you’re a charter member of the great white bigot militia. If you need that boiled down, I’m up to the challenge: opposing Messiah Barry’s war on America’s liberty and prosperity is RACIST. So sayeth the race card waving assholes at the SPLC.

This ‘beware the great white bigot’ turd needs to be flushed. It needs to be flushed before they use it to make a pre-emptive, Nanny State, strike against our inalienable individual liberty. Send it down the crapper before the stench suffocates you.

We need a conversation about race in America

From Pat Buchanon --

Barack says we need to have a conversation about race in America. Fair enough, but this time, it has to be a two-way conversation. White America needs to be heard too, not just lectured at. This time, the Silent Majority needs to have its convictions, grievances and demands heard ... and among them are these:

First, America has been the best country on earth for black folks. It was here that 600,000 black people, brought from Africa in slave ships, grew into a community of 40 million, were introduced to Christian salvation, and reached the greatest levels of freedom and prosperity blacks have ever known. Wright ought to go down on his knees and thank God he is an American.

Second, no people anywhere have done more to lift up blacks than white Americans, who have spent untold trillions since the '60s on welfare, food stamps, rent supplements, Section 8 housing, Pell grants, student loans, legal services, Medicaid, Earned Income Tax Credits and poverty programs designed to bring the African-American community into the mainstream.

Governments, businesses and colleges have engaged in discrimination against white folks -- with affirmative action, contract set-asides and quotas -- to advance black applicants over white applicants. Churches, foundations, civic groups, schools and individuals all over America have donated their time and money to support soup kitchens, adult education, day care, retirement and nursing homes for blacks.

We hear the grievances. Where's the gratitude???

Barack talks about new 'ladders of opportunity' for blacks. Let him go to Altoona ... and Johnstown ... and ask the white kids in Catholic schools, "How many were visited lately by Ivy League recruiters handing out scholarships for 'deserving' white kids?" Is white America really responsible for the fact that the crime and incarceration rates for African-Americans are seven times those of white America? Is it really white America's fault that illegitimacy in the African-American community has hit 70 percent and the black dropout rate from high schools in some cities has reached 50 percent?

Is that the fault of white America or, first and foremost, is it a failure of the black community itself?

As for racism, its ugliest manifestation is in interracial crime, and especially interracial crimes of violence ... Is Barack Obama aware that while white criminals choose black victims 3 percent of the time, black criminals choose white victims 45 percent of the time?

Is Barack aware that black-on-white rapes are 100 times more common than the reverse, that black-on-white robberies were 139 times as common in the first three years of this decade as the reverse?

We have heard ad nauseam from the Rev. Al Sharpton about Tawana Brawley, the Duke 'rape' case and Jena. All turned out to be hoaxes, but about the epidemic of black assaults on whites that are real, we hear nothing.

Sorry, Barack, some of us have heard it all before, about 40 years and 40 trillion tax dollars ago.

Justice Dept rules OK to Carry Clubs and use Racial Epithets at Voting Polls

Boy, them campaign laws are always changing! The Justice Dept. cleared up a little misunderstanding of allowable campaign techniques. All "hate crime" laws will be suspended on election day.

It appears some of the "New" Black Panthers working the polls were overly enthusiastic when they were handing out "I Voted" stickers and ruffled some lily-white feathers...

From the Patriot Post --

Charges of voter intimidation against three members of the "New" Black Panther Party were dropped this week by the Obama Justice Department. It should have been an open-and-shut case of voter intimidation and harassment. Men in paramilitary uniforms, at least some of whom belonged to Louis Farrakhan's infamous Nation of Islam, were caught on videotape standing in front of a Philadelphia precinct blocking the doorway while voters tried to enter on Election Day last November. The thugs, one of whom brandished a club, cast menacing stares and racial epithets at white voters in line.

The men responsible were charged and the Obama administration actually won the case, but they moved to dismiss the charges on May 15. No justifiable explanation has been given, but we can reasonably suspect that it's primarily because Obama doesn't want to anger his constituents. A spokesman for the Justice Department had the nerve to state, "The department is committed to the vigorous prosecution of those who intimidate, threaten or coerce anyone exercising his or her sacred right to vote." The department clearly did not do that in this situation. Liberal civil rights attorney Bartle Bull was a witness and is leading the charge against the administration's actions.

Meanwhile, the "Justice" Department rejected a program put in place by Georgia's Secretary of State Karen Handel to screen state databases to flag ineligible voters. Their excuse was that the program was inaccurate and discriminatory, though they refused to share the information that led to that conclusion. Handel, who is a Republican candidate for governor, noted that the decision would lead to a flood of non-qualified voters. She also noted the irony that Justice was on board for the program when it was created. What changed? The ruling party in Washington, and the new bosses want wide open voter rolls with no restrictions on eligibility because it makes it easier for them to rig elections.

I wonder what would happen if the Tea Party Patriots would be politically active like this? Or maybe if a pro-life group or the NRA welcomed people to the polls in this manner.

Don't worry, the Department of Homeland Security, Justice Dept & the FBI will be keeping us safe from these radical, one issued, Bible-toting, gun-clinging, life-loving extremist hate groups and those damn pagan Tea Party Patriots who think they can hide behind their God given rights -- that are protected by the Constitution. They have some nerve -- huh?

Rumor has it that the "Old" Ku Klux Klan will be forming the "New" Ku Klux Klan and will also be assisting at the polls in the next election.

Did Racist Blacks Elect Obamao?

Now that some numbers are coming out on the appointment of Premier Obamao - an apparent trend shows why he was elected. Yes, blacks voted for Obamao - not because of who he was as a man he was - but because the color of his skin.

From USA Today --

The study by the Pew Research Center, released Thursday, also showed that for the first time blacks had the highest voter turnout rate of any racial or ethnic group among people ages 18 to 29. Analysts said it remained to be seen how fully the strong minority participation, a reflection of both changing U.S. demographics and enthusiasm for Democrat Barack Obama, would carry over to future elections.

In 2008, about 65% of blacks went to the polls, nearly matching the 66% voting rate for whites. Black women had the highest rates of participation among all voters at 69%; they were followed by white women (68 percent), white men (64 percent) and black men (61 percent).

Pew's analysis of census data found that whites cast about 100 million, or 76%, of the 131 million total ballots last November, compared with 79% in 2004. It was the sharpest percentage drop in more than a decade.

Blacks, meanwhile, had their sharpest increase in voter participation in more than a decade, with 15.9 million casting ballots to make up 12.1% of the electorate. Blacks previously had seen their share decline to 11% in 2004 after their low turnout in Republican George W. Bush's re-election win over Democrat John Kerry. More...

White people who did not vote for Odumbo were readily dismissed as racist. It meant nothing that you just did not agree with his campaign promises, his agenda, or who he was as a man - if you didn't check Barry's box - you were a racist. Currently, if you speak out against Barack the Bi-Racial Prez or his administration- you are labeled as a racist or... a right-wing radical extremist.

So since the blacks voted in record numbers just because of the melanin enriched color of Obamao's skin and not the content of the man - wouldn't this make them racist too?

Governors refusing Stimulus Funds accused of being Racist

I want to start this post by saying - I could not agree more with AG Holders remarks that our country is cowards when it comes to race. Though I do find it hypocritical coming from a man who got his job BECAUSE of the color of his skin - I have to ask who is afraid of race discussions?

Who keeps making race an issue? What party is hypersensitive about race?

Time and time again, we are seeing how Obama's election has done everything but transcend race. In fact I would say it has injected a racial backdrop on everything he does. Instead of being the President of the United States - his minions and Barack himself - continually play the race card for our first Black POTUS, even though he is bi-racial.

The citing of race and portrayal of victimhood is a typical, tried and proven tactic of most inner-city community activists. When Harry Reid raised questions about Roland Burris taking Obama's senate seat - he was accused of being racist. We also have all the hoopla over the stimulus cartoon in which some believe Barack was portrayed as a trained chimp. And of course we remember how anyone that did not support Obama was also accused of being racist.

Now comes the Stimulus Bill packed with 8yrs of democrat desires. Besides not creating the jobs as it is intended too, the bill will also saddle states with increased spending programs they will be unable to pay for in the future. Because of this, several Governors - Govs. Mark Sanford (SC), Rick Perry (TX), Bobby Jindal (LA), Haley Barbour (MS), Sarah Palin (AK), Butch Otter (ID) & Tim Pawlenty (MN) are resisting giving up the rights of their state and are refusing to accept portions of the money...

“The federal money in this bill will run out in less than three years for this benefit and our businesses would then be stuck paying the bill,” Jindal said. “We must be careful and thoughtful as we examine all the strings attached to the funding in this package. We cannot grow government in an unsustainable way.”

“Subject to learning more, my position is that Mississippi won’t accept funds that require us to have a tax increase later, because [they would force] us to change our rules for qualifying for unemployment compensation,” Barbour said. (Yahoo News)

Your asking what the hell does this have to with being racist - right? It will show how the race card is convientently tossed out and until this stops - working past race and fixing our country will never happen.

For very good reasons and agreeing with over half of the US, some of these above Governors are being accused of being racist for resisting the stimulus funds...

House Majority Whip James Clyburn, D-S.C., amplified earlier statements that the governors' hesitation in accepting stimulus money had insulted him because "these four states are in the heart of the black belt.''

Clyburn singled out Republican Govs. Mark Sanford of South Carolina, Rick Perry of Texas, Bobby Jindal of Louisiana and Haley Barbour of Mississippi.

This is a perfect example of how race is used by blacks, some democrats and most liberals when they don't get what they want. Leading up to this stand-off and taking a swipe at political rival, SC Governor Sanford, Clyburn inserted an amendment empowering state legislative leaders to accept the special federal aid if the governor fails to act within 45 days of the measure’s enactment.

So if there are ways to force the Governors to take the stimulus funds - why would Clyburn come out and inflame issues by bringing up race? Why would Clyburn purposely name the southern states and leave out the northern states? I'll tell you why - because invoking the race card makes headlines.

If handi-wipe Holder is sincere in his remarks and is not a coward himself - then he should publicly rebuke Clyburn for making these racially explosive, baseless and insensitive remarks. The same goes for President Obama if he truly wants to show his sincerity about transcending race - unless this too will be another broken campaign promise.

The Congressional Black Caucus is RACIST!

How's this for transcending color?

An interview was conducted with Obama's chief spokeman, Robert Gibbs, by WND correspondent Les Kinsolving about the race requirement for joining the exclusive Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) and the remarks made by Rep. William Lacy Clay (D-MO).

To date, three Congressman, Rep. Pete Stark (D-CA), Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn) and Rep. Anh ("Joseph") Cao (R-LA) have been denied membership into this exclusively racist club because they were - "judged solely on the color of their skin and not the content of their character". -For some odd reason - I swear the current members CBC have heard these words before.

From WND --

Kinsolving continued, "Since the members of Congress who have applied to join the Congressional Black Caucus have been turned down because, as the black caucus' William Lacey Clay put it, 'they are white and the caucus is black...'

Kinsolving reported Clay said, "Mr. Cohen asked for admission, and he got his answer. He's white and the caucus is black. It's time to move on. We have racial policies to pursue and we are pursuing them, as Mr. Cohen has learned. It's an unwritten rule. It's understood."

...Clay later issued an official statement from his office: "Quite simply, Rep. Cohen will have to accept what the rest of the country will have to accept – there has been an unofficial congressional white caucus for over 200 years, and now it's our turn to say who can join the 'the club.' He does not, and cannot, meet the membership criteria, unless he can change his skin color. Primarily, we are concerned with the needs and concerns of the black population, and we will not allow white America to infringe on
those objectives." More...

On Inauguration Day we heard how "white people need to start doing right," then we hear Obama's administration does not want the stimulus money going to white construction workers or professionals because that would not be fair.

What do you think the reaction would have been if Bush said, "Blacks need to start doing the right thing and stop having illegitimate children, selling drugs & being criminals"?

We can clearly see the - "our day has come" mentality has taken over the White House. Will Barack, our racially confused President, allow this to become a "we're getting ours" presidency and show us 'victimhood at its' finest' or will he keep his campaign promises and transcend race?

The latter does not seem likely.