Friday, December 26, 2008

Two Candidates for the Death Penalty

This story turns my stomach with disgust and total anger...

From Fox News --

A Tucson couple face murder charges after an autopsy revealed their baby girl's death was caused by malnutrition.

Authorities arrested 26-year-old Terri Sullivan and 27-year-old Scott Sullivan after their 6-week-old child Kimberlie died Aug. 30.

Tucson police say the Sullivans are charged with first-degree murder. Initially, they were charged with felony child abuse.

A Pima County Medical Examiner's report says the baby weighed 5.8 pounds at death and 7 pounds 12 ounces at birth.

Forensic pathologist Dr. Eric D. Peters wrote there were no drugs in the "emaciated" baby's body and "no evidence of recent injury."

Tucson police say Terri Sullivan told detectives she had been starving her baby since the child was about 11 days old. She gave no reason for her alleged actions.


Both parents should be candidates for the Death Penalty. Not only should they be sentenced to death, but I hope their death will be 10x more painful than the poor babies. How can a person worthy of life willfully deprive any child like this?

It makes my skin crawl just imagining what this poor defenseless child was thinking while she was slowly being starved to death.

2 comments:

  1. This could be the two cheapest death penalty cases to date. Lock them both in a cell, and don't check on them for about a month. Within that time they should both be dead from starvation, or one fat from cannibalism. If a cannibal survives, remove the last remaining scraps of the first animal, and let the second continue to starve to death. I will do the clean up work for $500. Sounds pretty cheap to me.

    Happy New Year!

    ReplyDelete
  2. In the bleak economic times we face, I find your response fiscally sound and very patriotic.

    I like your idea as long as we can use a cattle prod in there somewhere.

    ReplyDelete

Don't be scared!