This time old leather face Schultz has her big old Betsy bloomers in a bunch over the SNL skit about New York Governor David Patterson. The SNL skit took aim at Patterson being blind among other things.
I agree it is not right to make fun of a person being blind, but Patterson routinely makes light of his being blind. In other words – he is comfortable with it and has learned to accept it. Not to mention that his blindness never stopped him from being a coke-snorting whoremonger while he was married or from becoming a politician. But old “Save the Day” Schultz still feels the need to protect him.
Why does Connie “I sleep with a Senator” Schultz feel the need to defend him? Because Schultz defending Patterson is a like a MSM Grand Slam in the bottom of the ninth at the World Series with two outs and you’re down by three. He is black, a democrat, former cokehead, cheats on his wife and is handicapped. For a liberal - what the hell more can you ask for!
Acknowledging the SNL skits on Palin by stating, “SNL portrayed her as a perky little loon,” Schultz, in attempts to defend her position of not defending Palin - but defending Patterson, enlightens us with how targets of humor should be chosen…
When it comes to picking targets for humor, I am reminded of what New York Times ethics columnist Randy Cohen told me in a 2002 interview, in which he described the philosophy of his former boss, David Letterman:"[W]e are free to attack what is volitional, but not those things over which a person has no control."
Huh… not attack someone for something over which they have no control - let’s remember that. I guess women should all have a dour mug like Schultz, lest any women showing an outgoing & positive attitude - be labeled a “perky little loon.”
In her hypocritical, politically correct, liberal puss-filled prose, Schultz claims stereotypes are harmful…
Time for a few deep breaths. The skit was tasteless and unfair, but it did not set the national agenda for the disabled. It might, however, provoke a national conversation about harmful stereotypes.
Before I hang Schultz and the PD on the “You’re a Hypocrite Hook,” I need to say this… Schultz proves why it so fun to play with liberals and Democrats – if you let them run their mouth about their “pick & choose” policies of what “Special Class” or “Flavor of the Month” ethnicity they should defend – their hypocritical bigotry usually shines through.
Schultz has stated people should not be picked on over something they have no control and stereotypes are harmful – right?
Then why no column about stereotypes being bad when her editors allowed Jeff Darcy to draw a cartoon implying that all Italians are members of the Mafia? How come no column expressing outrage when her editors published the picture & poem from Andrea Levy inferring ALL white people are racist and members of lynch mobs?
So Schultz is either A.) exposing herself as a hypocrite or B.) accusing her editors of being close-minded, hypocritical bigots. Which one is it Connie?
The facts will bear out that the answer is A & B!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Don't be scared!