Girlieman of the Week
Date Awarded: May 16, 2008
Girlieman: Barack O’Dumbo
Girlie Antics: If the truth hurts, WHINE.
It’s accurate to state that the Free State of PIG is not Vicente W. Bush’s biggest fan. That hasn’t changed, when we’re dealing with domestic policy. On the other hand, when it comes to his role as Commander in Chief, we give GWB much higher marks. Our confidence in him was justified, this week, when he let it all hang out while addressing the Israeli parliament:
"Some seem to believe we should negotiate with terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along," the President said to the country's legislative body, "We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: 'Lord, if only I could have talked to Hitler, all of this might have been avoided.' We have an obligation to call this what it is -- the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history." (ABC)
He nailed this one and that’s a fact that wasn’t lost on his Israeli audience. There are, as expected, some who took the president’s prose very hard, a fact that, finally, brings us to our Girlieman of the Week, Barack O’Dumbo.
"It is sad that President Bush would use a speech to the Knesset on the 6Oth anniversary of Israel's independence to launch a false political attack. It is time to turn the page on eight years of policies that have strengthened Iran and failed to secure America or our ally Israel. Instead of tough talk and no action, we need to do what Kennedy, Nixon and Reagan did and use all elements of American power -- including tough, principled, and direct diplomacy - to pressure countries like Iran and Syria. George Bush knows that I have never supported engagement with terrorists, and the President's extraordinary politicization of foreign policy and the politics of fear do nothing to secure the American people or our stalwart ally Israel."
Did president Bush come close to naming O’Dumbo? Nope. Did he allude, in any way, shape or form, to O’Dumbo? Nope. Was there the slightest implication that he was talking about O’Dumbo? Nope? So why is O’Dumbo acting so defensive? Why did O’Dumbo, automatically, assume that president Bush had just pinned an ‘appeaser’ label on him? Why is O’Dumbo trying to deafen us with his incessant caterwauling?
I’m smelling a classic case of ‘if the truth hurts, WHINE ABOUT IT’. Despite his convenient memory, he’s still the man who stated, on the record, in a televised debate, that he would meet, with no prior conditions, with America’s sworn enemies. O’Dumbo’s response in the debate means he would, unquestioningly give legitimacy to America hating scumbags like Mahmoud al-Gilligan, Kim Jong-Il, Castro the Sequel, Hugo "Skipper" Chavez and, presumably, Osama himself. That sounds like appeasement to us, how about you?
For being a guilt-ridden, caterwauling cretin who hasn’t got the guts to own up to his prior statements...for whining about a perceived ‘attack’ where none exists...for being a gutless wonder whose instinctive response to anything is whining, Barack Hussein "Uncle Jemima" O’Dumbo is the Politically Incorrect Gazette’s Girlieman of the Week.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Don't be scared!