Sunday, October 26, 2008

Case challenging Obama's candidacy going to U.S. Supreme Court

Philip Berg, an attorney from PA, the state that Obama, Biden & Murtha have labeled as racist and full of rednecks, is challenging the eligibility of Obama's candidacy.

After having his case dismissed by a Philadelphia Federal Court, Berg is taking his case to the U.S. Supreme Court...

From Obama Crimes --

Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, announced today that he is immediately appealing the dismissal of his case to the United States Supreme Court. The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.

Berg said, "I am totally disappointed by Judge Surrick's decision and, for all citizens of the United States, I am immediately appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court.

This is a question of who has standing to uphold our Constitution. If I don't have standing, if you don't have standing, if your neighbor doesn't have standing to question the eligibility of an individual to be President of the United States - the Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world - then who does?

So, anyone can just claim to be eligible for congress or the presidency without having their legal status, age or citizenship questioned.

According to Judge Surrick, we the people have no right to police the eligibility requirements under the U.S. Constitution.What happened to ‘...Government of the people, by the people, for the people,...’ Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address 1863.

We must legally prevent Obama, the unqualified candidate, from taking the Office of the Presidency of the United States,” Berg said.

Our website now has 71.8 + million hits. We are urging all to spread the word of our website – and forward to your local newspapers and radio and TV stations.

Berg again stressed his position regarding the urgency of this case as, “we” the people, are heading to a “Constitutional Crisis” if this case is not resolved forthwith.

For copies of all Court Pleadings, go to


  1. Handled right, the Fed District Court throwing out Berg for lack of standing can present a political check-mate “win” on appeal for the anti-Obama side (if not in law, in the Court of Public Opinion). Here’s how: SIMPLY SPREAD AROUND OBAMA’S APPELLATE BRIEF HAVING TO ARGUE AGAINST AN AMERICAN VOTER’S RIGHT TO RAISE THE QUESTION UNDER THE CONSTITUTION. Should be a PR disaster for the Dems and Obama!!!

  2. Philip Berg is the one who should be prosecuted. This sleazeball lawyer will try any underhanded trick he can think of to prevent one man he hates from running for President. Berg is the real anti-Democrat among us. He wants the right to choose the President himself, like the Reagan/Bush Supreme Court did in 2000. Anything to prevent the people's choice from winning! Berg is a scurrilous loser who probably searches for a loophole in the rules for Monopoly to prevent his kids from beating him. Crawl back under your rock, Philip.

  3. jbo,

    I feel as if Mr. Berg is well within his rights and should ask the hard questions.
    Obviously you feel passionate about your candidate and you are allowed to be as uninformed as you wish to remain. However I would like the answer to the question.
    There is so much about Obama that America does not fully know. Where he was when he was younger and is there any documentation to prove the history he claims?
    I do not ask the question because I am afraid, Oh my GOD ,he might win. Barrack Obama will lose this election because America is not ready for a Socialist President nor a Black Socialist President.
    Ohio would not vote for a scholarly,well seasoned,qualified man like Ken Blackwell for Governor (because he was Black)what makes you think they will elect a non qualified, green socialistic liberal Black like Barrack Hussein Obama for President?
    It won't happen. So save your outrage for after the election you can use it to salve your wounds.

  4. Ted, JBO & GOP Flame - thanks for commenting.

    JBO I sense some anger in your tone. Is this the example of working together that Obama speaks about?

    With the Hope he preaches, shouldn't you be saying - look deep my friends, search for the answers to all the questions you may have, then we can work together?

    It should make you wonder why he will not voluntarily produce any requested documents if he has nothing to hide.

    Ted - you mentioned the Constitution...

    Obama feels the Constitution that he wants to represent is a bad and negative document. Maybe this is where jbo gets his negativity from.

    Yes, Obama feels that while the Constitution tells us what the Gov. cannot do to us - it does not, and it should, tell us what it can do FOR us.

    Frame that thought -

    Obama feels the Consitution should be a document stating what our country can do FOR us.

    The democrat icon - JKF - felt it should be the other way around! "Ask not what your country can do for you"

    Sums up how far the democrat party has came all these years. This clearly shows that Barack is NOT the democrat he portrays himself to be. Most people either are too blind or refuse to accept this fact.

    GOP FLame -- green, red, blue, white, black, etc... a candidate should be judged on who they are. The Blackwell question will not be answered by any democrats becasue that would force them to tell the truth.

    Blackwell was a bad black man because he did not subscribe to their socialist & liberal views - like a good black guy is supposed to do. Think Je$$e & Rev.


Don't be scared!